Back to whitepapers
Board reviewing TR24/1 action plan at boardroom table
Whitepaper17 Mar 202635 min readIFA Principals, Compliance Officers, Heads of Advice

The TR24/1 Implementation Playbook: Turning FCA Findings into Operational Improvement

A 90-day action plan for IFA firms to address every TR24/1 finding — register accuracy, risk profiling, cashflow modelling and Consumer Duty.

Thesis

TR24/1 isn't just a critique — it's a roadmap. Firms that systematically address each finding improve both regulatory standing and advice quality.

Download Pack

The TR24/1 Implementation Playbook: Turning FCA Findings into Operational Improvement

PDF v1.0 • 28 pages • 6.5 MB

Highlights

Research Depth

6

chapters covering operating model, governance and implementation decisions

Audience Focus

UK IFA

IFA Principals, Compliance Officers, Heads of Advice

Delivery Format

28

page PDF briefing with board-level framing and operational guidance

Chapter Structure

Chapter 1

TR24/1 in context

What the FCA reviewed, why it matters, and how the findings connect to Consumer Duty enforcement.

Chapter 2

Centralised Retirement Propositions under the microscope

CRP design, income sustainability, risk profiling, and ongoing review framework expectations.

Chapter 3

Advice file quality: closing the evidence gap

The 33%/22%/11% findings, information collection requirements, and the RIAAT framework.

Chapter 4

Control frameworks that actually work

Advice register design, MI dashboards, QA processes, and governance structures.

Chapter 5

Consumer Duty alignment

Mapping TR24/1 findings to the four Duty outcomes with practical checklists.

Chapter 6

90-day action plan

Week-by-week implementation sequencing from audit through to board reporting.

Why this matters for advisory firms

This paper is designed for firms that need recommendations to be commercially viable, operationally repeatable and defensible under regulatory scrutiny. It focuses on how evidence quality, process discipline and decision transparency combine to improve both client outcomes and supervisory confidence.

The objective is practical execution rather than theory alone: you can use the framework to tighten suitability consistency, reduce remediation overhead and improve how technical decisions are explained to clients, compliance teams and senior management.

Industry References

These whitepapers are written for UK advisory operating context and align with Consumer Duty, suitability governance, and evidence-based planning standards expected by compliance and supervisory teams.